BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND TWITTER BACKGROUNDS

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

AUTOMATED ELECTION


Is The Philippines Ready for an Automated Election System?


Is the Philippines ready for automated election? Are we ready for something new?
What is Automated Election System (AES)?
Is it Feasible? How reliable can the computerized (automated) election system be?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, let us discuss the advantages and disadvantages that will emerge if our country engages with an automated election.
Like a Star @ heaven Advantages Like a Star @ heaven
bounce It provides efficient way for voting with less hassle.
bounce Voters cannot prolong the process of voting and lined up in a crowd.
bounce You get a tally immediately, rather than having to count votes by hand.
bounce Increased speed and efficiency of electoral task and faster electoral results

Like a Star @ heaven Disadvantages Like a Star @ heaven
silent Financial Savings
silent Possibilities for the candidates can hire a computer experts to hack the system and manipulate the entire votes.Unless if the system is fully secured.
silent Since it is computer based, there is no paper trail and no way to double check the tally.

What is Automated Election Sytem(AES)?
  • Computerized voting is a superior form of casting ballots. It allows for fairer and faster voting. It takes many forms with different processes but how it is implemented depends on the technological facilities allocated for the elections procedure. Automated election system (AES) is a system that uses appropriate technology to accomplish and aid such tasks as voting, counting, consolidating, canvassing, and transmission of election result, and other electoral process. Republic Act No. 9369, which is the Amended Elections Automation Law provides for the use of two forms of AES.

  • The voters have to shade the oval which corresponds to their candidate of choice using pencil in a specially scanned paper ballot. It is composed of 2 Laptops, 2 Digital Scanners, 2 card readers, 1 hub and 1 printer. The votes in the shaded ballots will then be scanned and counted using an Automated Counting Machine (ACM).

  • The first is a paper-based election system defined as “a type of automated election system that uses paper ballots, records and counts votes, tabulates, consolidates, canvasses and transmits electronically the results of the vote count.” It uses the Optical Mark Reader (OMR) Technology.

  • The second form is the Direct Recording Electronic (DRE). It is defined as “a type of automated election system that uses electronic ballots, records votes by means of a ballot display provided with mechanical or electro-optical components that can be activated by the voter, processes data by means of a computer program, records voting data and ballot images, and transmits voting results electronically.” voters are provided with a Voting Pad where the photos of candidates can be selected by pressing on the desired picture. Once the vote is final, a receipt is generated after pressing ‘BOTO‘. The Board of Election Inspectors keeps the receipt just in case there are complaints raised.

http://iskwiki.upd.edu.ph/index.php/Online/Automated_Elections_in_the_Philippines
Providers of the Technology
  • Computerized elections would not be possible without Republic Act No. 9369 and the lawmakers behind it. But, ultimately, this new system of voting cannot be implemented without the technology need to run the whole system. As far as the government is concerned, making such provisions is the extent of their ability to provide computerized elections. A third party is needed to fully implement the Act by providing the government and the Philippines with the technology needed to run the elections. Here is where the technology providers come in. Different firms have showed interest in providing the machinery and computers for the Philippines’ automated elections. 11 of which are foreign companies, though only one of them will be chosen and be given the contract through a series of bidding. These are US firms Sequioa, Avante, ES/S, Hart and Scantron; Venezuela’s Smartmatic; United Kingdom’s DRS; India’s Bharat; South Korea’s DVS Korea; Gilat Solution of Israel and Spain’s Indra System. Whoever gets the contract will be renting out about 80,000 machines that will be used for the 2010 elections. Two of these providers have already serviced the elections here in the Philippines, specifically the ARMM elections.

http://iskwiki.upd.edu.ph/index.php/Online/Automated_Elections_in_the_Philippines
Is it Feasible?
  • It is feasible. An automated election, for a fact, cannot fully prevent cheating but only certain forms of it could be prevented through check and balance. It is also a fact that there is no system that is tamper proof. The following are plausible forms of check and balance: paper audit trail of ballots, protection of software source code, no switching of ballot boxes, the testing of the technologies, and the addition of some amendments on the Senate Bill No. 2231. The Automated Election Bill in the Philippines requires that there should be a voter verifiable paper audit trail. This feature of the bill will reduce the incidents of vote buying and increase the security and credibility of the people’s votes. The voter verifiable audit trail enables the voters to review and edit their votes. On the same note the right amount of protection on the automated elections' software source code would prevent hackers on hacking on to the computers for counting and thus prevents the tampering on the number of votes. On the old system, manual transmissions of ballot boxes allow the possibility of ballot switching but with the new system, it would be prevented. Another way to check if it is feasible to have an automated election without cheating to be prevalent is to test the technology itself. The technology should be checked if it is efficient and if it works the way it should be to further eliminate certain problems with it. By testing the technology, COMELEC will know beforehand if the system can be tampered as well as its errors. The Senate approved Senate Bill No. 2231, the Amendment to the Election Automation Law states additional security for the random auditing of the system and system for recount. Other kinds of check and balance are instead of writing the name, voters marks the candidate of their choice, the voter should physically feed the ballot into the machine where the ballot has its picture taken, the election returns are proposed to be automatically transmitted, the OMR machines should not be equip with any kind of communication devices, there should be seven copies of the ER to be sent to different computers, COMELEC would provide PC’s for the different parties so that they can follow the tabulation, and the statement of vote would be projected in each canvassing center so that the watchers can compare the totals.

  • According Ustadz Esmael Ibrahim of the Assembly of Darul Ifta of the Philippines said illiteracy in the ARMM is worst in Sulu, with 40 percent of its people unlearned.

  • On a national level, one in 10 Filipinos can not read and write, according to the survey.

  • The 2003 functional literacy survey of the National Statistics Office (NSO) showed ARMM as having the lowest basic literacy rate in the country, with 30 percent of its people aged 10-64 years old considered illiterate.

http://www.jpsimbulan.com/2008/08/06/is-the-philippines-ready-for-an-automated-election-system/

As an IT student,we are aware of the possible situations that will happen. Of course, I rather choose the new system becuase of its big advantage. But there are still many questions that bugs me and we will find out after the election. Very Happy As what I've read in the article "Let the “trial-and-error” in our election process begin" Very Happy

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

“ Girl-boy Relationship is it a Boon or Bane? ”


Nowadays, students are engaging in early relationships. Most of teenagers are now doing it for fun or to experience having a relationship with the opposite sex. But is it really good for us? what can you say about this?

In the second panel discussion, the group had a very significant topic which was very important to all especially to the youth today. In their panel discussion entitled “Is Student Girl-Boy Relationship is it a Boon or Bane?” I was really confused of the panelists they had. When the speaker asks the panelists about what can they say about their topic, they were not really consistent about their answers, for I observed that they have doubts in it. The speeches were not organized and they did not presented some points and evidences or relevance in their topic. They were not ready for their topic that they don’t have the introduction, body and conclusion which are the most important of all. As one of the audience, I was really confused if they where in the boon or bane side.

What was good about their discussion was they let their spectators relate to their topic for they shared their own experiences. I learned that having a student girl-boy relationship is not good because it just an interlude of our studies and sometimes it will destroy our future.

What is a Leader Role?


- defines the relationships between the manger and employees.

Managerial Roles

Managers assume multiple roles to meet the many demands of performing their functions. Henry Mintzberg has identified ten roles common to the work of all managers.

The ten roles are divided into three groups:

· Interpersonal - link all managerial work together

· Informational - ensure that information is provided

· Decisional - make significant use of the information

The performance of managerial roles and the requirements of these roles can be played at different times by the same manager and to different degrees depending on the level and function of management. The ten roles are described individually, but they form an integrated whole.

The three interpersonal roles are primarily concerned with interpersonal relationships.

In the figurehead role:

- the manager represents the organization in all matters of formality

- the top level manager represents the company legally and socially to those outside of the organization.

- the supervisor represents the work group to higher management and higher management to the work group.

In the liaison role:

- the manger interacts with peers and people outside the organization.

- the top level manager uses the liaison role to gain favors and information, while

- the supervisor uses it to maintain the routine flow of work.

The leader role:

- defines the relationships between the manger and employees.

- The direct relationships with people in the interpersonal roles place the manager in a unique position to get information.

The three informational roles are primarily concerned with the information aspects of managerial work.

In the monitor role:

- the manager receives and collects information.

In the role of disseminator:

- the manager transmits special information into the organization.

- the top level manager receives and transmits more information from people outside the organization than the supervisor.

In the role of spokesperson:

- the manager disseminates the organization's information into its environment. Thus, the top level manager is seen as an industry expert, while the supervisor is seen as a unit or departmental expert.

- the unique access to information places the manager at the center of organizational decision making.

There are four decisional roles.

In the entrepreneur role:

- the manager initiates change.

In the disturbance handler role:

- the manger deals with threats to the organization.

In the resource allocator role:

- the manager chooses where the organization will expend its efforts.

In the negotiator role:

- the manager negotiates on behalf of the organization. The top level manager makes the decisions about the organization as a whole, while the supervisor makes decisions about his or her particular work unit.

The supervior performs these managerial roles but with different emphasis than higher managers. Supervisory management is more focused and short-term in outlook.

Thus, the figurehead role becomes less significant and the disturbance handler and negotiator roles increase in importance for the supervisor.

Since leadership permeates all activities, the leader role is among the most important of all roles at all levels of management.